Request a research critique

What deserves a closer scientific examination? Recommend a paper, book, laboratory resource or other research output for a critical assessment by The Bible of AI.

Explain the contribution and the questions you would like us to examine. The editorial team will consider the request in light of the journal’s scope, the available evidence and its capacity.

Submitting a request does not guarantee selection, a critique or publication. An editorial critique is not a substitute for journal peer review or an endorsement of the work.

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required. DOI and institutional affiliation are not prerequisites. Please do not include confidential material or sensitive personal information.

Research critique request

1. Your contact details

Please provide professional contact information only.

Used to communicate about this request.
Independent researchers are welcome. Leave blank if not applicable.

2. The work you recommend

Identify the exact version to be considered. Provide public links rather than confidential files.

List the authors or identify the team or institution responsible for the work.
Use a stable publisher, repository or project URL. Do not include passwords, access tokens or private sharing links.
Give the journal, publisher or repository; publication date and version; and DOI, ISBN or other persistent identifier, if available. State explicitly when these do not apply or are not yet assigned.

3. Why an editorial critique would be useful

Concrete questions and supporting evidence help us assess the request. A concise account is more useful than promotional language.

Explain the questions you would like examined, why our editorial scope is relevant, and who would benefit. Around 100–250 words is usually sufficient.
Describe what the work adds, its methods and main limitations. Link to supporting data, code, protocols or independent evaluations where available; state any access restrictions. Around 100–250 words is usually sufficient.
Identify grants, sponsors or other support, and any role they had in the research or this request. Disclose relevant financial or professional interests. “No external funding”, “None” or “Not known” are valid answers; do not provide financial account details.
Is this request connected with a thesis or degree, a publication requirement, a funded-project report, professional assessment, or another commitment? Explain briefly, or state “None”. This context does not in itself imply any judgement about research quality.
You may mention previous or parallel reviews and any relevant deadline. Do not disclose confidential reviewer reports. A deadline does not commit the editorial team to a response date.
Before submitting
Your contact details and this request will be used to assess the submission and communicate with you. Read the privacy policy. Do not submit sensitive personal data or material you are not entitled to share.
Share this on: